Look at these sound bites from an editorial today:
"...the $789 billion stimulus and recovery package that Congress approved this week could have accomplished more than it did..."
"...President Obama’s futile pursuit of bipartisanship, rendered it smaller and less focused than it needed to be..."
"...the stale politics of Washington ended up including $70 billion for
relief from the alternative minimum tax. The relief is necessary, but
it has nothing to do with stimulus or recovery..."
"...The real question is what the Obama administration does for a follow-up..."
"...after a botched rollout this week of their bank bailout plans,
administration officials will likely need another few weeks to develop
a coherent proposal..."
"...it’s not clear whether Mr. Obama’s team understands the scale of the effort required.."
"The administration also appears to be waffling in its support for
passing new legislation that would allow bankrupt homeowners to have
their mortgages modified under court protection."
Here is the full editorial. And yes, that's right. This is from the New York Times, not the Journal. Congratulations to the Times for taking a fair and even-handed approach in its assessment. Where is Bill O'Reilly right about now?